Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!usc!wuarchive!mit-eddie!apollo!oj
From: oj@apollo.HP.COM (Ellis Oliver Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re:  Memory allocation bug
Message-ID: <47672d19.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Date: 13 Dec 89 15:40:00 GMT
References: <8912111825.AA06689@umix.cc.umich.edu>
Sender: root@apollo.HP.COM
Reply-To: oj@river.UUCP (Ellis Oliver Jones)
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 12

In article <8912111825.AA06689@umix.cc.umich.edu> derstad@CIM-VAX.HONEYWELL.COM ("DAVE ERSTAD") writes:
>
>I found there is a patch on the November patch tape that sounds
>suspiciously like this problem but only applies to SAU2, 3, and 5
>machines.  I haven't gotten any word back from the Apollo
>hotline yet.

Hmm, either your definition of the term "November Patch Tape" is different
from ours, or you have a strange tape.  As far as I can tell, there
wasn't a Prism November patch tape, and the Moto tape contained
only patches related to the X Window System.
/oj (speaking for myself, not necessarily for HP Apollo)