Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!psuvm!art100
From: ART100@PSUVM.BITNET (Andy Tefft)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Call For Discussion
Message-ID: <89344.130627ART100@PSUVM.BITNET>
Date: 10 Dec 89 18:06:27 GMT
References: <15801.apple.info-apple@pro-exchange>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 14

In article <15801.apple.info-apple@pro-exchange>, rich@pro-exchange.cts.com
(Rich Sims) says:
>
>btw- I don't think the comp.sys.apple2.tech group would gain us a lot, but
>it's certainly worth a shot.  I base that on my readings of the comp.sys.amiga
>and amiga.tech groups, where most articles are cross-posted to both, which
>just increases the density instead of splitting it into more manageable
>chunks.

I don't see how crossposting really is that big of a problem. Most news
systems/readers only store/forward crossposted articles once and you only have
to see them once. Doesn't really increase volume at all. The only worry
is having to read them at all, and there would still be a substantial
savings there, i.e. not ALL articles would be crossposted.