Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mailrus!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!mephisto!ncsuvx!news From: rnf@shumv1.uucp (Rick Fincher) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: ShrinkIt Compression (modified Message-ID: <1989Dec10.183431.4055@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Date: 10 Dec 89 18:34:31 GMT References: <20846@<1989Dec8> <113300217@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: rnf@shumv1.ncsu.edu (Rick Fincher) Organization: NCSU Computing Center Lines: 51 In article <113300217@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> saa33413@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes: > >Try telling all that to Apple. They're the ones with the look-and-feel suits >against imitators of the desktop interface used by the IIGS and Macintosh. They sued Microsoft because they licensed code to them and the thought they exceeded the license. They also feel that their additions to the XEROX interface (which Apple licensed) should be protected. They aren't faring so well in court. I can see a copyright issue in making a screen look just like someone elses. After all Apple spent millions in human interface studies when developing the Mac interface. Other companies shouldn't be able to rip off their work or their code. I think that is different from the idea of, say, a pull down menu. Other companies should just make theirs look non-identical to Apple's. >(Ever wonder why the interface of the NeXT is so different from the Mac when >Steve Jobs designed both the Mac and the NeXT? Now you know!) Actually jobs didn't design either. He stepped in to head the Mac design team after the project was started. He is responsible for for a lot of what's good AND what was bad about the original Mac. Guy Kawasaki told a story about jobs: Jobs was committed to using the 5.25 inch Twiggy drives (the ones in the original Lisa) in the Mac. All the engineers knew that 3.5 drives were the way of the future but Jobs had forbid them to even talk about it, and had banned Sony (they make the 3.5's) engin- eers from even visiting Apple. Well the engineers knew they were right so they invited the president of Sony in, behind Jobs' back, to discuss getting the drives. Well, while they were talking Jobs came in the building, so they stuffed this aged white haired-Japanese gentleman into a closet. His English was not too good and he was very confused. Jobs came in and everyone started counting holes in the ceiling, trying not to look guilty. When he left they pulled the guy out of the closet and continued the discussion. Needless to say it was eventually decided that 3.5's would be used, and they had the sup- plier on line to provide them! >The idea of >putting a patent on an idea is, IMHO, unconscionable, but do you think that >stops the good ole boys in Cupertino? I don't think so. > I agree, after all, it was a XEROX idea that spawned the Mac. I don't think Apple can win in court. I think their moves are just corporate hardball in the marketing game. They are trying to slow down all of the other guys while they try to get as mch of the post MS-DOS market as possible. The millions they spend on no-win legal actions will more than be offset by increased sales in machines. History shows that no one can stop a good idea. Rick Fincher rnf@shumv1.ncsu.edu