Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!AECLCR.BITNET!01659
From: 01659@AECLCR.BITNET (Greg Csullog)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Dear Rich Covert
Message-ID: <8912061919.AA14595@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 6 Dec 89 04:19:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 18

I agree with the netter who wondered whether or not dear old Rich actually
understands Laser printing speed. Hey Rich, for your benefit I'll rephrase
an earlier posting.

1. I digitized a photo of my daughter with the Migraph Hand Scanner.

2. I printed the .IMG file from a Mega 2 to an SLM804 and it took less
   than 1.5 minutes.

3. I printed the same file from an AT at 10 MHz with an 80287 also at
   10 MHz (overall NORTON SI = 12.4). and the pic took just over 44 minutes
   printing from GEM Paint.   <<< Yeah, 44 MINUTES >>>

The difference is due to transmission speed.

Hey, if you really believe in this 11 ppm, 8 ppm, 6 ppm stuff, that lakefront
property in Canada's Arctic is still for sale and has your name written all
over it!