Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!pollux!attctc!chasm From: chasm@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Charles Marslett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Why is VGA ROM duplicated at C000:0 & E000:0 (QEMM related) Summary: Compaq did it, not the VGA Message-ID: <10515@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 7 Dec 89 15:16:04 GMT References: <4086@mhres.mh.nl> Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 51 In article <4086@mhres.mh.nl>, hst@mh_co2.mh.nl (Klaas Hemstra) writes: > I have a question concerning the VGA ROM BIOS. > > On the two different systems I was able to check this ROM BIOS was located at > address C000:0000 AND (!!!) AT E000:0000. > (Systems: A Compaq 386s with Compaq VGA and a Paradise VGA card on an AT comp.) > > Of course I don't care how VGA uses my memory map, as long as it works, but > this duplicated memory usage causes a problem running QEMM (386). The situation is caused by certain (not so neat) BIOS shadowing techniques, used by Compaq and several other box vendors to avoid problems with paged BIOS ROMs. I know of no popular boards for AT-bus systems that really use paged ROMs, so I dislike the technique (I think it overkill), but it allows the code to be executed at E000:0000-7FFF and the tables to be paged in at C000:0000-7FFF if the code is written to handle that -- I had to modify my BIOS to access the tables at C000:0000-7FFF even if relocated because of software packages that check vectors for VGA/EGA presence (another bad coding practice). If you disable the BIOS cache or BIOS shadowing function in your system setup (most allow this, and I think Compaq does), then the E000 copy of the BIOS should disappear. > So I told QEMM to include the memory from C000:000 - C600:0000. > At first this seamed to work fine but later I discovered that some VGA > graphic modes did not work. Of course because there ROM BIOS was gone ?! > After some experimenting I was able to include C300:0000 - C600:0000, but > I'm still not sure about all VGA modes (haven't tested most of them). Our VGAs (with BIOSes written before the middle of this year) would have worked fine in this situation (though the software package, whose name I can- not remember right now, would not recognize your system as having a VGA in it). As I mentioned above, this is because most VGA BIOSes reference the tables at C000 with absolute segment references (rather than based on the BIOS CS register like I did). > Biggest questions: Why does VGA duplicates it's BIOS, > Is it always the case ? > Can it be disabled ? It doesn't, all systems don't do it the same way, and mostly it can be disabled with the setup program in the system ROM or on the setup diskette that (hopefully) came with the system. > Thanks for your attention, > Klaas Hemstra Charles Marslett STB Systems, Inc <-- apply all standard disclaimers chasm@attctc.dallas.tx.us