Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!dross
From: dross@umn-d-ub.D.UMN.EDU (david ross)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: DR DOS
Keywords: help
Message-ID: <3071@umn-d-ub.D.UMN.EDU>
Date: 9 Dec 89 19:24:38 GMT
References: <7434@cbnewsm.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: dross@ub.d.umn.edu.UUCP (david ross)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
Lines: 12

In article <7434@cbnewsm.ATT.COM> wg@cbnewsm.ATT.COM (Bill Gieske) writes:
>Has anyone had any experience with DR DOS?

I've posted my gripes with DRDOS before; I won't waste more bandwidth on
them.  I should point out that while the DRI employees who read this
group have been very supportive, both DRI and 2001 (who distributes DRDOS
in the US) totally ignored every one of my written requests for help
and/or upgrade information 

I finally replaced DRDOS on my system with MSDOS 3.3, and 
found the improvement very pleasant; many programs that didn't work before
now do without complaint., and my TPA is larger.