Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:11029 comp.sys.mac:43834
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!erci18
From: erci18@castle.ed.ac.uk (A J Cunningham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac
Subject: SADE (was Re: Macbugs update )
Keywords: Macbugs, debugger, SADE, Junk
Message-ID: <1332@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 7 Dec 89 10:44:01 GMT
References: <776@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <1890@mathrt0.math.chalmers.se>
Reply-To: erci18@castle.ed.ac.uk (A J Cunningham)
Organization: Edinburgh University Merry Pranksters
Lines: 19

In article <1890@mathrt0.math.chalmers.se> d6maca@]2;hacke1: /tmp]1;hacke1dtek.chalmers.se (Martin Carlberg) writes:
>
>I have a IIci and using SADE as a debugger. It's very good.
>
	Well I dunno about the IIci but as far as SADE goes IMHO it's a
piece of crap. I'm using a IIcx and it is so *SLOW*. It's also
unfriendly, unintuitive and just doesn't work properly. My project
involves two sets of sources in different folders. If two files have the
same name this really screws SADE. Also when highlighting code SADE
frequently highlights the wrong text. Compared to the debuggers that
SYMANTEC produce all I can say is SADE sucks! If it wasn't for the fact
that Apple are paying for this project I would have thrown out MPW long
ago.
		Tony Cunningham

-- 
Tony Cunningham, Edinburgh University Computing Service. erci18@castle.ed.ac.uk

	"If the thunder don't get ya then the lightnin' will."