Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies
From: gillies@m.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: White Knight and Zmodem
Message-ID: <8400198@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 12 Dec 89 17:36:11 GMT
References: <11143@csli.Stanford.EDU>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:csli.Stanford.EDU:11143:m.cs.uiuc.edu:8400198:000:601
Nf-From: m.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies    Dec 11 22:03:00 1989


Re: WK 11.02 zmodem auto-receive.

So what is the verdict?  Who has white knight 11.02?  Does it really
cure all the problems with zmodem auto-receive?  Is it as fast as
zterm?  Zterm works so well, I am tempted to get WK and convert all my
RR9.4 scripts to use zmodem, since 9.4 kermit & my unix kermit seem to
misbehave around byte #65K on large uploads.

I need to know if Scott Watson has fixed all the WK 11.02 problems.


Don Gillies, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois
1304 W. Springfield, Urbana, Ill 61801      
ARPA: gillies@cs.uiuc.edu   UUCP: {uunet,harvard}!uiucdcs!gillies