Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!auspex!guy
From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Why no job control in 386/ix?
Message-ID: <2691@auspex.auspex.com>
Date: 6 Dec 89 18:49:21 GMT
References: <3880@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> <1989Nov19.180741.8950@tolerant.com> <324@ubbs-nh.MV.COM>
Reply-To: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 7

>Also ksh is part of Sys V.4 so you will see it sooner or later 8-).

So is "csh", for what it's worth (SunOS 4.1-derived, which means
4.3BSD-derived, not crufty old Xenix/ancient BSD-derived).  (Given a
system with both, I'd personally use "ksh", but, just like editors, it's
99% an issue of taste and 1% an issue of objective advantages and
disadvantages, I suspect....)