Xref: utzoo comp.windows.x:15755 comp.os.vms:20649
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!chico.pa.dec.com!klee
From: klee@chico.pa.dec.com (Ken Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: DECwindows 2.0 is it slower than 1.0?
Message-ID: <2255@bacchus.dec.com>
Date: 8 Dec 89 18:25:03 GMT
References: <Dec.7.09.47.32.1989.2547@elbereth.rutgers.edu>
Sender: news@decwrl.dec.com
Reply-To: klee@decwrl.dec.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: DEC Western Software Laboratory
Lines: 14

In article <Dec.7.09.47.32.1989.2547@elbereth.rutgers.edu>,
sback@elbereth.rutgers.edu (Steve Back) writes:
> I'm in the process of upgrading from DECwindows 1.0 to DECwindows 2.0 and

I posted something about DECwindows 1.0 being based on X10 and
DECwindows 2.0 being based on X11.  I was refering to versions of the
Ultrix Worksystem Software.  UWS1.0 is based on X10R4.  UWS2.* is based
on versions of X11.  VMS DECwindows 1.0 is indeed based on X11, not X10.
Sorry about any confusion.

Ken Lee
DEC Western Software Laboratory, Palo Alto, Calif.
Internet: klee@decwrl.dec.com
uucp: uunet!decwrl!klee