Path: utzoo!telly!philmtl!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!merlin.usc.edu!usc.edu!raulmill
From: raulmill@usc.edu (Raul Deluth Rockwell)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Stallman's attitude
Message-ID: <RAULMILL.89Dec7101943@girtab.usc.edu>
Date: 7 Dec 89 18:19:43 GMT
References: <8041@stiatl.UUCP>
Sender: news@merlin.usc.edu
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 15
In-reply-to: meo@stiatl.UUCP's message of 6 Dec 89 22:02:45 GMT

In article <8041@stiatl.UUCP> meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) writes:

;> Mr. Stallman has declared legal war on everyone who writes software
;> and thinks they should be able to charge for it, but I have yet to
;> see the justification for this. There may be some - I'm just saying
;> I haven't seen it.

Not even!  Mr. Stallman charges for software.  (or hadn't you
noticed?  8^)

On the other hand, have you ever tried to fix something which requires
you have an At&T Source Code License?  Or how about Sun's statement of
the form: "If you use this software you have implictly agreed not to
look at the object code or reverse engineer it."
--