Xref: utzoo alt.sources.d:378 news.admin:7972 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!datapg!sewilco From: sewilco@datapg.MN.ORG (Scot E Wilcoxon) Newsgroups: alt.sources.d,news.admin Subject: Re: Stupid reposting service (was Re: SLIP/getty/printers on Terminal Servers) Message-ID: <24007@datapg.MN.ORG> Date: 14 Dec 89 19:13:33 GMT References: <10282@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> <5343@omepd.UUCP> Reply-To: sewilco@datapg.MN.ORG (Scot E Wilcoxon) Followup-To: alt.sources.d Organization: Data Progress, Minneapolis, MN Lines: 17 In article emv@math.lsa.umich.edu writes: >Bad: "very long sources" (1000 lines? 500 lines? I dunno. Maybe 0.) If the source was not posted in a sources newsgroup, it is not 'too long'. I've found some large gems in non-sources groups over the years, and they've faded away elsewhere because they weren't in an archived group. "Very long" is 40 parts or so. > patches in comp.sources.bugs Are we supposed to wade through all the discussion and debugging in c.s.bugs? The patches should get reposted here so we can easily spot them. -- Scot E. Wilcoxon sewilco@DataPg.MN.ORG {amdahl|hpda}!bungia!datapg!sewilco Data Progress UNIX masts & rigging +1 612-825-2607 uunet!datapg!sewilco I'm just reversing entropy while waiting for the Big Crunch.