Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!iuvax!purdue!bee
From: bee@cs.purdue.EDU (Zaphod Beeblebrox)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Renewed call f/ discussion : ALT.KIDS
Message-ID: <8859@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Date: 6 Dec 89 16:39:45 GMT
References: <1989Nov17.032939.11435@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <1222@mondo.omni.com> <1989Nov26.043958.771@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <6352@hacgate.UUCP> <^N+ZQ|@rpi.edu> <14610@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Reply-To: bee@cs.purdue.edu (Zaphod Beeblebrox)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University
Lines: 23

Said woodd@boulder.Colorado.EDU (WOOD DEREK H): 
(in article <14610@boulder.Colorado.EDU>)
|
|That all depends on what we would decide to call a 'kid'.  If its under the
|age of 18, there are a lot of college students who are 'kids'.  And, of
|course, Zaphod and all the others are correct with 42.

Actually I've been deliberately avoiding this line of discussion
because the one thing I have to say will likely get my mailbox filled
with flames.  Although I will agree that 42 is of course the answer.

Well, since I'm posting, I might as well make my one comment; it seems
to me that all of this talk about creating a group for kids to talk is
redundant.  After all, we already have talk.bizarre.

[ quickly activating thermal shield ]

                                          B.E.E.
-- 
  Z. Beeblebrox   |  I live with two people, I like both of them.
(alias B. Elmore) |  He likes both of me and I like both of him.
bee@cs.purdue.edu |  They're my alter egos and to them I'm wed,
  ..!purdue!bee   |  'Cause I'm happy I live in a split-level head. -- Nap. XIV