Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!cunyvm!maine.bitnet!tar
From: TAR@MAINE.BITNET (Thom Rounds)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: pink floyd group
Message-ID: <89341.232430TAR@MAINE.BITNET>
Date: 8 Dec 89 04:24:30 GMT
References: <89340.135711RLE100@PSUVM.BITNET> <7222@ficc.uu.net>
Lines: 28

In article <7222@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) says:
>
>Tell you what. Before creating any more specific groupie groups let me run a
>vote on rec.music.rock. Unless flamed to death before then I'll call for a
>discussion period Dec 12 or so. If I am flamed to death I'll call for something
>else. You have been warned.
>

    Tell you what. Go ahead and run your call for votes. In the meantime, I'll
continue hosting the campaign for Pink Floyd's own group. There's plenty of
precedent here, rec.music.gdead, rec.music.beatles, etc, and we (Floyd fans)
happen to think Pink Floyd deserves it's own group. If I were to wait for you
to run the call for whatever on rec.music.rock, I would have done alot of work
in vain. In other words, it's not over till it's over. And it's not over. As
long as there are still Pink Floyd fans, there's always this Pink Floyd fanatic
campaigning for an elite group (not a 'groupie group', please!! I imagine it's
comments like that that get you 'flamed to death'). So to put it short, I'm not
going to stop now. You have been warned.

P.S. Good luck with rec.music.rock. I'll vote on it if I get around to it.
-------
              |    Thom Rounds
  _  /|       |
  \'o.O'      |    INTERNET: tar@maine.caps.maine.edu
  =(___)=     |    BITNET: TAR@MAINE
     U        |    UUCP path: psuvax!psuvm!maine!tar
 Ack! Phht!   |
              |    Disclaimer: NONE