Xref: utzoo news.groups:15577 rec.autos:26578
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!cec2!jnk6393
From: jnk6393@cec1.wustl.edu (Jordan Nathaniel Kimberg)
Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.autos
Subject: Re: rec.autos split - CALL FOR DISCUSSION
Message-ID: <1989Dec12.183249.13439@cec1.wustl.edu>
Date: 12 Dec 89 18:32:49 GMT
References: <315@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <26165@sequent.UUCP>
Sender: news@cec2 (USENET News System)
Reply-To: jnk6393@cec2.wustl.edu (Jordan Nathaniel Kimberg)
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Lines: 19

>In article <315@watserv1.waterloo.edu> tom@mims-iris.waterloo.edu (Tom Haapanen) writes:
>rec.autos	    Discussions about cars
>rec.autos.driving   Discussions about driving, radar detectors, fines, 55 mph

Damn good idea...  

My thoughts on the matter are that it doesn't hurt people who don't want
the split to subscribe to two newsgroups (unless they have something 
against their reading material being organized).  

As for us people who could care less about half of the material, it wastes
valuable time "killing" all subjects I don't care about, when I have tons 
of other stuff to sort through.  

I'm ready to vote...


- Jordan Kimberg
- Wash U in St Louis