Path: utzoo!utstat!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!skl From: skl@van-bc.UUCP (Samuel Lam) Newsgroups: news.software.nntp Subject: Re: A suggested solution (was Re: When was last?) Summary: Then the NNTP peer sites would need to run NTP as well... Keywords: NNTP, Time, Magic Ticket Message-ID: <83@van-bc.UUCP> Date: 8 Dec 89 08:31:20 GMT References: <1989Dec7.212233.12005@me.toronto.edu> Reply-To: skl@wimsey.bc.ca (Samuel Lam) Organization: Balliffe International, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 10 In article <1989Dec7.212233.12005@me.toronto.edu>, eastick@me.utoronto.ca (Doug Eastick) wrote: >If you can talk NNTP, why not talk NTP (Network Time Protocol) as well? But wouldn't the upstream sites my site talks to via NNTP have to have NTP running as well? (Since those sites are under different administrative control, I can't just tell them to run NTP.) -- Samuel Lam or {uunet,ubc-cs}!wimsey.bc.ca!skl