Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!decwrl!shelby!bloom-beacon!ARIEL.UNM.EDU!lazlo
From: lazlo@ARIEL.UNM.EDU (Lazlo Nibble)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Laugh etc.
Message-ID: <8912061900.AA29094@ariel.unm.edu>
Date: 6 Dec 89 19:00:46 GMT
Sender: root@athena.mit.edu (Wizard A. Root)
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 19
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

nbc@INF.RL.AC.UK writes:

> You are certainly correct  - it is *very* subjective and as you can see
> from above I take the opposite view. Guess this is what helps to make
> Kate's work so interesting: even the smallest details are cause for
> debate.

Well, it's part of what maKes subscribing To Love-Hounds so interesting
anyway; I thinK debaTes liKe This are more a result of the intense
fanaticism and anal-retentiveness of certain KaTe followers than any
inherent aspects of her worK iTself.

Granted, her music is very beautiful, intriguing, and complex, but once
discussion of it gets down to the "Laugh Debate" level, that's when
it's time to start wondering about certain people's grip on reality.

                                                   Lazlo (lazlo@ariel.unm.edu)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you build it, he will come.