Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!aqdata.UUCP!sullivan
From: sullivan@aqdata.UUCP ("Michael T. Sullivan")
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: reaching out; perfection
Message-ID: <1989Dec7.193651.27791@aqdata.uucp>
Date: 7 Dec 89 19:36:51 GMT
References: <860849@mac.Dartmouth.EDU>
Sender: root@athena.mit.edu (Wizard A. Root)
Organization: aQdata, Inc.  Western Region -- San Dimas, CA
Lines: 13
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu


From article <860849@mac.Dartmouth.EDU>, by Julian.West@MAC.DARTMOUTH.EDU:
> 
> So, if anyone wants to deny that one of Kate's songs is
> perfect _under_my_definition_, and to submit proof, they
> will have to explain just how it can be improved.

Obviously, Kate thinks at least one of here songs is imperfect:  which
version of "Wuthering Heights" is perfect?
-- 
Michael Sullivan          uunet!jarthur.uucp!aqdata!sullivan
aQdata, Inc.
San Dimas, CA