Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!cbnews!military From: sysmgr@dover.eng.umd.edu (System Manager) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Tom Clancy Message-ID: <12153@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 9 Dec 89 00:41:28 GMT Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Organization: U. of Maryland Computer Aided Design Lab Lines: 39 Approved: military@att.att.com From: sysmgr@dover.eng.umd.edu (System Manager) In article <12095@cbnews.ATT.COM>, willner@cfa203.harvard.edu (Steve Willner) writes... : : : :Having just finished _Red Storm Rising_ (1986), I'll append a capsule :review. The novel's strength is the number of interesting and :surprising strategems it contains, but I considered the plot badly :flawed by a major hole. There were other, minor errors in the plot :logic and in the technology of infrared imaging, though as far as I :could tell most of the other technology was accurate. (But infrared :imaging is something I get paid to do; my knowledge of the other :technologies is limited.) The characters were stereotypical. And Mr. :Shuger's criticism is valid; weapons - especially US weapons - almost :always work as intended, and intelligence (on the US side, anyway) is :far too accurate to be convincing. I guess what I'm saying is that I :had a lot of trouble "suspending my disbelief." : :If you want to see this sort of thing done right, read _The Third World :War_; it's by a retired general and is much more convincing. (My copy :has somehow disappeared, so I can't give author's name or publisher, :and there is some chance the title is slightly wrong. It was published :in the early 1980's, I think.) "The Third World War" Gen. Sir John Hackett, I believe. Having rapping with Clancy on GEnie and sat in on two Roundtables on said service with him, I think your summation is pretty correct; things *do* work too well in his books (Maybe why the Government likes 'em?) and he tends to be a little 2-D in his characterizations. You want good FICTION, try "The Day Before Midnight" by Steven Hunter. Or is it Steven Maynes? Hum. Doug