Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!bu-cs!att!dptg!mtunb!jcm From: jcm@mtunb.ATT.COM (John McMillan) Newsgroups: unix-pc.general Subject: Re: ksh as replacement for sh on 3b1 Message-ID: <1719@mtunb.ATT.COM> Date: 7 Dec 89 23:02:48 GMT References: <1049@icus.islp.ny.us> <12028@cbnews.ATT.COM> <1717@mtunb.ATT.COM> <901@hsi86.hsi.UUCP> Reply-To: jcm@mtunb.UUCP (John McMillan) Distribution: unix-pc Organization: AT&T ISL Middletown NJ USA Lines: 37 In article <901@hsi86.hsi.UUCP> stevens@hsi.UUCP (Richard Stevens) writes: >In article <1717@mtunb.ATT.COM>, jcm@mtunb.ATT.COM (John McMillan) writes: >> >> 1) Replacing SH with KSH is a serious breach of sanity. >> KSH is ALMOST a superset of SH -- but the differences are VERY >> REAL. It can waste hours or days for support people when folks >> play this game. > >That's funny, because the latest release of the KornShell from the >Toolchest specifically lists the UNIX-PC as one of the systems >on which ksh has been used as a replacement for sh. Perhaps you're >referring to the older version of ksh (circa 1986) that comes with >the 3b1 ? The MAJOR cases of MY being mis-directed on a 3B1 happened a coupla years ago. Even in the past 4 weeks I've heard someone complain about this practice -- regarding a 6386, I believe. Discrepancies between the two are numerous, but I don't keep the lists. The last time _I_ was bitten by one of these differences was a few months ago when something like 'set -- getopt ...' got me, as I remember. (Nope, I don't remember which type of hardware I was driving at the time.) _I_ am not about to presume someone has performed an exhaustive test of the compatibility mentioned in a Toolchest article. I do not dispute it: I just find it irrelevant. How much is life improved by the replacement? Very little for me. Not enough to warrant the possible down-stream aggrevation, certainly. I exec ksh in my .profile and I use it all the time... by its name. If YOU want to add to your experience of shared-suffering on this planet, then DO things like this: I'm more interested in minimizing MY pain than yours !-) My comment was directed towards sparing folks trouble, not invoking biblical threats.... There's common agreement _MY_ sanity was breached and sunk LOoooong ago. jc mcmillan -- att!mtunb!jcm -- muttering for self, not THEM