Xref: utzoo alt.activism:2433 sci.environment:4381 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!crdgw1!ge-dab!puma!rich!jnixon From: jnixon@rich.ge.com (John F Nixon) Newsgroups: alt.activism,sci.environment Subject: Re: Trashing Greenpeace Message-ID: <186@puma.ge.com> Date: 17 Jan 90 22:41:54 GMT References: Sender: news@puma.ge.com Reply-To: jnixon@rich.UUCP (John F Nixon) Distribution: na Organization: GE Advanced Technology Labs, Moorestown, NJ Lines: 19 In article jym@eris.berkeley.edu (& Dyer) writes: > BE A HERO, SAVE A WHALE > SAVE A BABY, GO TO JAIL > >What gives? Does anyone know what the anti-abortion movement has > against Greenpeace? Against Greenpeace-like activities, such as > saving whales? Have I missed something? Some people consider babies to be part of the environment. The pro-lifers are much like the greenies in that they see what they consider bad things happening, and want to do someting about it. And, like the greenies, pro-lifers are attempting to influence public opinion so their view is adopted. If you want to save whales (life on this planet), why not infant humans (also life on this planet)? You asked, not me. ---- jnixon@atl.ge.com ...steinmetz!atl.decnet!jnxion