Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uhnix1!moray!urchin!p6.f889.n106.z1.fidonet.org!PETER.MARSHALL
From: PETER.MARSHALL@p6.f889.n106.z1.fidonet.org (PETER MARSHALL)
Newsgroups: alt.cosuard
Subject: Videotext and BBSs
Message-ID: <10047.25B28098@urchin.fidonet.org>
Date: 13 Jan 90 17:39:00 GMT
Sender: ufgate@urchin.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:106/889.6 - Bayou Beastie, Houston TX
Lines: 11

Thanks for your reply, Cliff. It does help to clarify your earlier post
somewhat, but doesn't seem to reach the implied public policy questions 
in that earlier post. More specifically, further clarification might be 
helpful as to why you maintain, relative to BBSs, that videotext,as you
understand it, is "the wave of the future?" One would also think that
videotext systems cover a whole lot more ground than the examples you 
cite.

PCRelay:WHHCL -> WESTNET + msgs Copyright 1990 by author.
4.10.9           Writers Happy Hours - Seattle - 206-364-2139