Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uhnix1!moray!urchin!p6.f889.n106.z1.fidonet.org!DAN.ARSENAULT
From: DAN.ARSENAULT@p6.f889.n106.z1.fidonet.org (DAN ARSENAULT)
Newsgroups: alt.cosuard
Subject: THOUGHT
Message-ID: <10222.25B333B2@urchin.fidonet.org>
Date: 15 Jan 90 23:41:00 GMT
Sender: ufgate@urchin.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:106/889.6 - Bayou Beastie, Houston TX
Lines: 13

I agree completely. There's no sense in just jumping into ANYTHING, 
least of all LMS. And of course you're quite right. LMS implementations 
that I have seen have been incredibly sleazy, like most things the baby 
bells do. I can only look back fondly to the days when I subcontracted 
out to do some work in the 713/409 uplink here in Houston. In those days
it was just after the time when the AT&T oart of the building got cut 
off from the SWB part. Those folks couldn't even talk to each per 
policy. There were lots of heads being scratched among SWB suits whilst 
gazing over rack after lovely rack of Western Electric load monitoring 
computers.
 * Via ProDoor 3.1 
 * RNet 1.02: COSUARD Net:COSUARD BBS-Houston, Tx-713-487-3911