Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpda!hpcuhc!hpsemc!jat
From: jat@hpsemc.HP.COM (Joe Talmadge)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
Message-ID: <220166@hpsemc.HP.COM>
Date: 15 Jan 90 17:56:06 GMT
References: <44475@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>
Organization: the Airborne Toxic Event
Lines: 24

Loren Petrich writes:
> stevec@csri.toronto.edu (Steve Cumming) writes:
> > bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes:
> >>This is a call for discussion for a new newsgroup:
> >>talk.philosophy.objectivism.
> >
> >I'll vote yes, as long as it's called talk.religion.objectivism.
>
> 	I guess if Randism, a.k.a. Objectivism, qualifies as a
> purportedly rationalistc, yet pseudo-religious belief system, then it
> must be placed alongside Freudianism and Marxism, which also fit the
> description quite well.

I see you morons don't realize what's going on here.  Voting "yes" for
talk.philosophy.objectivism will get the Objectivists out of some
groups that they have appropriated, e.g., sci.philosophy.misc, and
give them a more suitable forum for their ideas.  



Joe Talmadge		  "They're not calling it a black billowing
jat@hpsemc.hp.com	     cloud anymore."
hplabs!hpda!hpsemc!jat 	   "What are they calling it?"
jat%hpsemc@hplabs.HP.COM   "The airborne toxic event."