Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekigm2!tcmaint
From: tcmaint@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM (Thomas A. Dowe)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This is T?d; this is T?d on drugs; questions?
Message-ID: <7878@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM>
Date: 17 Jan 90 09:00:50 GMT
References: <10981@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> <5280@buengc.BU.EDU> <7856@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM> <90016.153643SXM101@PSUVM.BITNET>
Reply-To: tcmaint@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM (Thomas A. Dowe)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Vancouver,  WA.
Lines: 19

In article <90016.153643SXM101@PSUVM.BITNET> SXM101@PSUVM.BITNET (Steve Murray) writes:
>In article <7856@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM>, tcmaint@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM (Thomas A.
>Dowe) says:
>>You mistake me again, Blair.  I don't believe in modration in any form.
>>The "mod" scene is not my style, I like bluejeans far too much to comprom-
>>ise my taste in such a manner.  However, even though perverse, I do like
>>the beat of some disco music; so I guess my second statement, above, is
>>just hyperbole at best.  At worst, perhaps you should make sure that "she"
>>gets this as another proof of my lying ways.

>Jeezus.  Did you have a chimp cut your cocaine for you, T?d?

Thanks for the compliment, Steve, but you won't fool Trish by pretending
to flame me like this.  This sophomoric attempt to misdirect is, in itself,
too direct.  Take a lesson from DJ; his is far more believable.  But...
don't be quite that stupid about it, OK?

Tad
tomd@pulsar.telcom.tek.com