Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!mcgill-vision!quiche!calvin!depeche
From: depeche@quiche.cs.mcgill.ca (Sam Alan EZUST)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: notable computer stories in fiction and the media
Keywords: 6502, movies
Message-ID: <1991@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: 17 Jan 90 00:45:29 GMT
References: <236@med.Stanford.EDU> <1989Dec11.235231.12158@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <6410@lindy.Stanford.EDU> <1187@ariel.unm.edu> <5894@umd5.umd.edu> <1990Jan8.002700.20183@Neon.Stanford.EDU> <6959@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-To: depeche@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca (Sam Alan EZUST)
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Lines: 27

In article <6959@lindy.Stanford.EDU> unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User) writes:
 >
 > lma@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Larry M. Augustin) wrote in an article:
 >>In  <5894@umd5.umd.edu> ziegast@umd5.umd.edu (Eric W. Ziegast) writes:
 >>>In <1187@ariel.unm.edu> lazlo@ariel.unm.edu.UUCP (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
 >>>In the Arnold Schwarzenagor thriller, The Terminator, one will notice the
 >>>6502 assembly code appearing on the left side of Terminator's-eye view
 >>>camera shots.

 >	As another poster mentioned, it was definitely 6502 code..
 >
 >	I BELIEVE it was actually a DOS 3.3 listing of some point and
 >may have actually been a patch to DOS 3.3 from an article in BYTE. I
 >am sort of kludging things that I remember together, as "BYTE" and "DOS 3.3"
 >are basically the two main points I remember.

Well, all the correct answers were given in this thread, but nobody
realized that there are more than one!

Yes, one listing was a RWTS dump... Another was a monitor
memory dump... And another was the output of Key Perfect. (Perhaps
there were more, but I definitely remember these three)..

-- 
S. Alan Ezust                                   depeche@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca
McGill University School of Computer Science -  Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    If pro is the opposite of con, what's the opposite of progress?