Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Y VAX? [was : TECO on a DEC-System 10] Message-ID: <1990Jan18.193530.22427@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <153.UUL1.3#5131@mvac23.UUCP> <457@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 90 19:35:30 GMT In article <457@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> jones@pyrite.cs.uiowa.edu (Douglas W. Jones,201H MLH,3193350740,3193382879) writes: > (the 11/15 was the OEM version of the 11/20?) Correct. > (the 11/40 was the OEM version of the 11/45?) Nope, quite unrelated. (The 45's number has always been a bit of a mystery.) The 40 was a cheaper, slower, cut-down 45 -- the new "mid-range" model to replace the 20 -- and originated the brain-dead low-end version of the MMU. > (the 11/35 and 11/30 were introduced later?) The 35 was an OEM 40. Never heard of a 30. > PDP-11/70 -- as I understand it, this was basically a PDP-11/45 > CPU with an expanded segmented memory mapping > architecture and something other than the UNIBUS > to connect the CPU and main memory. There was a 45 hiding inside, but the MMU was new (faster as well as wider), there was a cache, there was a wider memory bus, and there were provisions for fast I/O devices going direct into memory without going through the Unibus. (These were often referred to as "Massbus" devices, but technically the Massbus was DEC's odd controller-to-peripheral bus rather than the controller-to-memory bus.) > (the 11/05 was at about the same time?) No, the 05 and the 45 were simultaneous -- 05 at low end, 45 at high end. > PDP-11/78 -- a paper machine, intended to outperform the 11/70, > with improved support for 32 bit operands. There were also several 11/7x models, never released, that were basically multiprocessor 70s. -- 1972: Saturn V #15 flight-ready| Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology 1990: birds nesting in engines | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu