Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!snorkelwacker!bionet!arisia!sgi!shinobu!odin!maddog!pkr
From: pkr@maddog.sgi.com (Phil Ronzone)
Newsgroups: alt.individualism
Subject: Re: Phil Ronzone's stereo
Message-ID: <2904@odin.SGI.COM>
Date: 17 Jan 90 19:58:12 GMT
References: <2310@odin.SGI.COM> <12569@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <2356@odin.SGI.COM> <1990Jan13.090428.25775@agate.berkeley.edu> <2818@odin.SGI.COM> <21643@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Sender: news@odin.SGI.COM
Distribution: usa
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 25

In article <21643@unix.cis.pitt.edu> rhg2@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Rich  Graham) writes:
>This is all well and good, but I'm still waiting for your basis of the
>concept of ownership.
>...
>If there is some basis of a concept of ownership that is more basic and
>more substantial, I'd like to hear it.


I own all my property. There are three kinds:

p0 = my own life
p1 = my ideas and thoughts (i.e., Einstein owns E=MC**2)
p2 = my tangible derivatives (farm the ground, I own the
     corn)

In many cases of p2, ownership is immediately transferred
upon production via prior agreement as per most blue and
white collar jobs.



------Me and my dyslexic keyboard----------------------------------------------
Phil Ronzone   Manager Secure UNIX           pkr@sgi.COM   {decwrl,sun}!sgi!pkr
Silicon Graphics, Inc.               "I never vote, it only encourages 'em ..."
-----In honor of Minas, no spell checker was run on this posting---------------