Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!njin!princeton!phoenix!roger From: roger@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig) Newsgroups: alt.individualism Subject: Re: Phil Ronzone's stereo Message-ID: <13024@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Date: 17 Jan 90 21:58:37 GMT References: <2310@odin.SGI.COM> <12569@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <2356@odin.SGI.COM> <1990Jan13.090428.25775@agate.berkeley.edu> <2818@odin.SGI.COM> <21643@unix.cis.pitt.edu> <2904@odin.SGI.COM> Reply-To: roger@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig) Distribution: usa Organization: Princeton University, NJ Lines: 65 In article <2904@odin.SGI.COM> pkr@maddog.sgi.com (Phil Ronzone) writes: >In article <21643@unix.cis.pitt.edu> rhg2@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Rich Graham) writes: >>This is all well and good, but I'm still waiting for your basis of the >>concept of ownership. >>If there is some basis of a concept of ownership that is more basic and >>more substantial, I'd like to hear it. >I own all my property. There are three kinds: >p0 = my own life Fair enough. What does this mean? To what extent may you defend your ownership? May you violate somebody's property rights (steal his food) to protect your right to your own life? May you restrict another's actions to lessen a THREAT to your own life? Life-as-property is tricky. >p1 = my ideas and thoughts (i.e., Einstein owns E=MC**2) In what sense does/did he own it? Did he have the right to control the use of it to derive other products of thought, e.g., further work in physics? Could this ownership be transferred? What happens when two people have the same idea independently. One idea, two "owners." What does p1 get you, and how does it differ from p0 and p2? Suppose we said that Einstein did NOT own that idea. How would the world be different? How would E's life have been different? >p2 = my tangible derivatives (farm the ground, I own the > corn) Would that be YOUR ground you're farming? How did you get it? From whom? How did the original owner get it? >In many cases of p2, ownership is immediately transferred >upon production via prior agreement as per most blue and >white collar jobs. Hmmm, doesn't seem to work for p1 -- or does the ETH (or wherever) own that formula after all? Now, let's think about coerced transfer of ownership (it happens!) and how to remedy it. Then, let's consider the conditions that make it realistic even to TALK about ownership: you can own something according to the above under any conditions, but it may be a pretty useless concept unless certain other things obtain as well. What are they? Good first step, Phil. Keep going. Roger > > >------Me and my dyslexic keyboard---------------------------------------------- >Phil Ronzone Manager Secure UNIX pkr@sgi.COM {decwrl,sun}!sgi!pkr >Silicon Graphics, Inc. "I never vote, it only encourages 'em ..." >-----In honor of Minas, no spell checker was run on this posting---------------