Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!apollo!nelson_p
From: nelson_p@apollo.HP.COM (Peter Nelson)
Newsgroups: alt.individualism
Subject: Re: Phil Ronzone's stereo
Message-ID: <481c597f.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Date: 18 Jan 90 16:14:00 GMT
Sender: root@apollo.HP.COM
Distribution: usa
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Apollo Division - Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 22


   keith@pawl.rpi.edu (Keith D. Weiner) posts...


>Umm, people? I just started reading alt.individualism again, and I noticed
>an argument about property.

>The correct approach to this question is: "Who created the property?" It is
>THIS person who owns it. He (she) may then transfer ownership voluntarily
>to someone else. 

   This is just an assertion.   How does Mr. Weiner propose to 
   demonstrate the truth of it?

   I propose, as I have all along, that the Real World is the 
   ultimate arbiter of all truth.   And in the Real World your
   "right" to a piece of property is a complex matter based
   on custom, law, and your immediate resources and ability to 
   use those resources to successfully defend your property
   rights.   

                                                ---Peter