Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!texbell!attctc!lll-winken!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucdavis!csusac!sactoh0!pacbell!osc!tma
From: tma@osc.COM (Tim Atkins)
Newsgroups: alt.individualism
Subject: Re: How many is enough?
Message-ID: <1874@osc.COM>
Date: 17 Jan 90 09:36:49 GMT
References: <7027@lindy.Stanford.EDU.
Reply-To: tma@osc.UUCP (Tim Atkins)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Object Sciences Corp., Menlo Park, CA
Lines: 12

In article <7027@lindy.Stanford.EDU. GA.JRG@forsythe.stanford.edu (June Genis) writes:
.
.If we follow Ron's arguments to their logical conclusion I think
.you will find that it forces you to accept successively world,
.galaxy, and ultimately Universal government.  While I don't deny

As long as it did what it was supposed to, no more and no less, why should
I care about its size or universality?  Good government is not necessarily
dependent on competing forms.  No, I would not feel afraid if the whole
world went rational!

- Tim