Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uhnix1!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: alt.religion.computers Subject: Re: Cheapest way to Unix program developement Keywords: Unix, GNUCC, GCC, 386 Message-ID: <4944@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 17 Jan 90 03:11:10 GMT References: <1271@island.uu.net> <2711@draken.nada.kth.se> <634@foster.avid.oz> <108@zds-ux.UUCP> Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston Lines: 18 > Again, I ask how do you distinguish linking from mere agragation? I don't. RMS does. The whole business about distributing unlinked sources and copies of the library attests to that. > I am asking this in a legal sense, In a legal sense you just have "mere opinions" of "various people". There is no case law yet. > And, you probably do want to look into this issue carefully before you > release any code. Which is all I said, so why the (mild) flame? I'm curious. -- Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva `-_-' 'U` "I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape somewhere"