Xref: utzoo alt.rock-n-roll:2881 misc.headlines:13527 rec.audio:18184 rec.music.cd:6286
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!marque!lakesys!macak
From: macak@lakesys.lakesys.com (James Macak)
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll,misc.headlines,rec.audio,rec.music.cd
Subject: Re: Stand up against CENSORSHIP!
Summary: FCC FALSE ALARM!
Message-ID: <1570@lakesys.lakesys.com>
Date: 16 Jan 90 16:09:25 GMT
References: <1226@mountn.dec.com> <7652@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Reply-To: macak@lakesys.UUCP (James Macak)
Followup-To: alt.rock-n-roll
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lake Systems - Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Lines: 37

Following is an article I read on news.announce.important that was recently
posted.  Let's get off this FCC false alarm already!

Jim


Article 5 in news.announce.important (moderated):
From: chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach)
Subject: FCC 'chain letter' -- please stop
Message-ID: <37718@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 9 Jan 90 23:41:56 GMT
Organization: Fictional Reality: We bring good things to life
Lines: 16
 
Recently a message announcing that the FCC is considering a surcharge on modem
users has been showing up on USENET in various groups. Research has shown that
there is no basis for this letter -- it seems to be an accidental re-release
of a 2 year old message. The FCC is not considering any surcharge of any kind,
and they are currently getting about 200 letters a day on the subject (that
they would like to see stop coming). The Talk Show host mentioned in the
letter (Jim Eason of KGO) has been pestered by a lot of calls (including the
FCC) wondering what was going on, and hasn't been involved in the issue in two
years.
 
Please STOP posting or distributing this message. If you have a copy, destroy
it. It is obsolete and causing problems on networks and BBSes nationwide.
There is no proposal on the docket and none being considered. We need to wipe
this silly thing out before things get further out of hand.
 
chuq



-- 

macak@lakesys.lakesys.com (James Macak)     "I'm curious, Doctor, why is it
      << All my own opinions. >>              called 'M-5' and not 'M-1'?"