Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jb10320
From: jb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jawaid Bazyar)
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll
Subject: Re: Skid Rows Causes Mayhem in Springfield!
Message-ID: <1990Jan17.191704.19638@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 17 Jan 90 19:17:04 GMT
References: <4622@helios.ee.lbl.gov> <8571@cbnewsm.ATT.COM> <33191@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <3858@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Reply-To: jb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jawaid Bazyar)
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 26

In article <3858@mace.cc.purdue.edu> you write:
>In article <33191@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> sl201009@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Rob Francis) writes:
>
>I'd be willing to bet Saturday night's IU-PU point spread that you would
>defend yourself.  That is what Sebastian did.  He defended himself.
>Unfortunately, an innocent bystander got hurt in the process.  PU beat the
>spread on Saturday .....
>
>     - Jeff
>-- 
>Jeff Boerio                     : Purdue University Dept. of Computer Science
>ajk@mace.cc.purdue.edu          : Purdue University Computing Center Volunteer
>boerio@orchestra.ecn.purdue.edu : Purdue University ECN Student Programmer

   Whoa. Double-take here.  Since when is hot-headed retribution "defense"?
Had someone come on stage with a bottle, or had a number of bottles been
thrown by the same immature person, S.B. would have had the right to "defend"
himself however he saw fit.  However-  this is a plain case of revenge.  He
could have had security haul the ass off- that would be defense.  But instead
he hurt a bystander.  Ol' S.B. gets a big "minus" in my book.


--
Jawaid Bazyar               | This message was posted to thousands of machines
Junior/Computer Engineering | throughout the entire civilized world. It cost
jb10320@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu    | the net hundreds, maybe thousands of dollars.