Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!apple!bionet!ig!ames!uhccux!afhampe
From: afhampe@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Andrew Hampe)
Newsgroups: alt.sex
Subject: Re: date rape
Message-ID: <6188@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>
Date: 17 Jan 90 07:28:00 GMT
References: <25721@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: afhampe@uhccux.UUCP (Andrew Hampe)
Distribution: na
Organization: if we must
Lines: 24

In article <25721@cup.portal.com> EZ-as-pi@cup.portal.com (Bruce
Robert Gilson) writes: [major deleteion]hem in this discussion, and
of course, yo cannot PROVE anything by analogy. But to turn up the
latest one, if I were known as a charitable person, no body would
have a right to rob me, BU if I were, AND I invited a fund-raise
>into my HOME, and showed him my check book, while implying he was
going to get a nice check, and then at the las minute tore up the
check saying, "No I don't like your style" don't y think I'd be
justifiably thought of i pretty bad terms by the charity in
>question? We aren't just talking abou

Yes and by analogy they should also be allowed to commit
grevious bodily harm upon you! eh no?

I think we have skipped over the problem of rape as violence
versus rape as  "uncontrollable urges". Isn't this whole
schtickt about, "Well she owes me..." merely a pleasant way of
saying, she's a prostitute and we are going to enforce our contract?

{ granted I am not extending this out to a question of the virtues of
contract law... ;-) }

ciao
drieux
.