Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!well!slf
From: slf@well.UUCP (Sharon Lynne Fisher)
Newsgroups: alt.sex
Subject: Re: Body count. . .
Message-ID: <15585@well.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jan 90 16:47:18 GMT
References: <70181@tiger.oxy.edu> <12982@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <18558@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Reply-To: slf@well.UUCP (Sharon Lynne Fisher)
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA
Lines: 33


>I find it very sexist of me but reasonable to say I can see a man haveing
>a harem but not a woman with manny husbands....thi sis because 
>when a man (and I do not mean to be crass) finishes with a woman
>he withdraws and his organ is clean and dry (after simple
>water is run over him) a woman sitll has some or all of his
>sperm in her...now a man going to ANOTHER woman is
>fresh and has nothing from the first woman that might go along with 
>him...however a woman haveing a second man...even if she does clean 
>herself...might have some of the first man's seamen within her
>a rather distasteful Idea to me...sorry you feminists that just my 

Why, what a coincidence.  I find it very sexist of you, too. However, I
don't find it reasonable.

What are you afraid of?  If somebody else's semen touches your dick, it'll
fall off?  Or you'll "turn" gay or something?

Besides, in this day and age, many people use rubbers.  I would think this
would especially be true in a multiple-partner situation.  That way
you wouldn't have to worry about getting any of that icky peckersnot
on you.

Have you ever had sex with a woman who's already had a guy come in her?
(It could be you.)  It's really nice.  She's *really* wet, and all warm
and opened up...sigh.

But congratulations for coming up with an excuse for polygamy, and not
polyandry, that I've *never* heard before.  

-- 
She began coming, making noises like a small animal in pain. "Ouch!
Ow! My paw! Ouch!"