Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcc6!sdcc13!pa1412
From: pa1412@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (pa1412)
Newsgroups: alt.sex
Subject: Re: Body count. . .
Message-ID: <6253@sdcc6.ucsd.edu>
Date: 20 Jan 90 01:56:46 GMT
References: <70181@tiger.oxy.edu> <12982@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <18558@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Sender: news@sdcc6.ucsd.edu
Organization: University of California, San Diego
Lines: 22

In article <18558@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> dragon@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Sam Conway) writes:
>eguardingGroup marrage...and reading sone things about sexual evolution
>I find it very sexist of me but reasonable to say I can see a man haveing
>a harem but not a woman with manny husbands....thi sis because 
>.... reasons why it is easy for a man to clean up for the next
>woman but a woman has semen left from the guy before...

As my memory serves, this was called 'sloppy seconds'. The main
thrust of this term was that no 'real' man wanted sloppy seconds. As
we know on the net any tasting of semen by men is a precursor to
homosexual behavior. The same men who thought this way didn't mind
the idea of the woman lapping up what they had to offer. Clearly
either women have different tastes i.e. they like the taste of semen
or these people liked the idea of women doing something the men
thought of as disgusting. I, being wierd, didn't mind being the
umpty-umpth on those few occasions where there were trading of
partners.

--
John Clark
jclark@ucsd.edu
pa1412@iugrad2.ucsd.edu