Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!UBVMS!V111HFQ3 From: V111HFQ3@UBVMS (Robert Charles Weiss) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.christia Subject: RCW: wrt/March for Life re:`pro-family' Message-ID: Date: 17 Jan 90 04:51:00 GMT Sender: Practical Christian Life Reply-To: Practical Christian Life Lines: 13 Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway X-Organization: University at Buffalo X-Envelope-to: christia@FINHUTC.BITNET X-VMS-To: IN%"christia@finhutc.bitnet" X-VMS-Cc: V111HFQ3 Jim McIntosh recently questioned my using the term `pro-family' in my post encouraging all who can to attend the March for Life in Washington, DC. I believe James Keifer handled the question quite well. I probably shouldn't have to elaborate, but I will, just a tad. Jim, to me, pro-family is something that encourages and supports the whole family. I used that word because my feelings are that the decimation of human life in the womb strikes against the very formation of family. If not the nuclear family, than most assuredly the human family. That's all I meant. Hope to see you there. I managed to talk my Dad into going. :) and that right there should be a separate praise report... shalom, bob