Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!lll-winken!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!UNCG!KILLIAN From: KILLIAN@UNCG.BITNET (The Mad Doctor) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga Subject: RE: Bridgeboard query Message-ID: Date: 18 Jan 90 16:04:00 GMT Sender: Info-Amiga List Reply-To: Info-Amiga List Lines: 41 Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway X-VMS-To: IN%"I-AMIGA@UBVM.BITNET" >The bridgeboards, for instance. I've heard conflicting rumors as to their >compatability with the MSDOG world. I would be a very unhappy camper if I was t o >find myself in a situation where I absolutely *HAD* to have MSDOG (for whatever >reason...), I go out and buy the $1700 A2286 AT-bridgeboard, plug it in, and >*boom* it isn't compatable! My question is this: *ARE* the bridgeboards (A2088 >& A2286) *TOTALLY* MSDOG (and/or OS/2 wrt the A2286) compatable with the big >blue? Anyone have any major problems, and if so, what? From what I've heard from people who've used both, the bridgecards are EXTREMELY compatible with their IBM counterparts. Commodore, when last I checked, knew of no bugs with them. Of course, that doesn't mean that bugs don't exist, but no one seems to know of any. (BTW--check around, I think you can find the A2286 for a bit less than $1700.) >I also am starting to hear problems with compatability between Amiga models. >When the 1Meg enhanced chip set memory becomes the standard, does this mean new >programs written on the 1Meg chip machine will not operate properly on the >older 512k chip RAM machine (and vice versa?) If so, I forsee problems in the >future! Ok...the new chip set should be fully compatible with all old programs. The only exception being one very bad programming habit where the programmer, instead of checking for existance of FastMem, already writes to FastMem if the machine has over 512K. So if you have a meg and it's all chip, the program will look at "more than 512K" and then try to write to FastMem, which isn't there. I don't know how popular this is to do, but I don't think there are THAT many bad programmers out there. The other way round is a different story. I'm not sure how the new chip set is set up, so this is a guess. The most you should get is an Out Of Memory error when it tries to access FastMem as chip. There is a bug in Sonix where you may be able to look at available memory and see 530K or so, try to load a sampled instrument and it says "Can't load instrument from disk!" because of insufficient chip memory; I'm assuming this is from trying to directly access FastMem as chip. >Thanks in advance for any helpful information anyone can supply. Well, like I said, I'm guessing, but I hope it dies help.