Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!HDEDH1!NADWL
From: NADWL@HDEDH1.BITNET (Scott Ophof)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Subject: Re: Two more items for the wish list
Message-ID: <MAILBOOK%90011810213816@EB0UB011>
Date: 18 Jan 90 13:17:56 GMT
Sender: MAIL/MAILBOOK subscription list <MAILBOOK@RICEVM1>
Reply-To: MAIL/MAILBOOK subscription list <MAILBOOK@RICEVM1>
Lines: 14
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
In-Reply-To:  Message of Wed, 17 Jan 90 11:21:41 EST from <MICHAEL@UTORONTO>

On Wed, 17 Jan 90 11:21:41 EST Michael Wagner said:
>>I'm not sure I agree about this being ok. Since "*A" and " A" have the
>>...
>Since this is wishlist time, I'd rather have the messages sorted into
>"thread" order, i.e. use the string of "in-reply-to" message-ids
>where available, and only use the GMD time/date logic when
>in-reply-to is not available or not tracable.  This would also
>alert you to messages that were "orphans"

I second this wish/motion, and have a feeling that *effectively*, Rainer
Woitok means the same thing.  Please correct me if I'm wrong, Rainer.

Regards.
Scott/