Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: Keith Vitek Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Caller ID Message-ID: <2890@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 13 Jan 90 17:56:58 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 23 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 28, message 8 of 10 In-Reply-To: message from kvitek@pro-party.cts.com Well, I saw on 20/20 or some show like that said that the technology to stop Caller ID was here. I was wondering if anyone knew what they were talking about... UUCP: ...!crash!pnet01!pro-party!kvitek ARPA: crash!pnet01!pro-party!kvitek@nosc.mil INET: kvitek@pro-party.cts.com Keith Vitek | Voice: 512/852-1841 | I want my NeXT... 5914 LiptonShire | or: 512/852-1780 | I want my AmigaUUCP... Corpus Christi, TX 78415 | FIDO: 1:160/40 | I want .......... [Moderator's Note: Well, it is news to me. Does anyone know of a way to legally (via some application of the tariff) avoid ID'ing themselves? I guess there are some places where possibly the more sensitive customers may be exempted, i.e. the 'women's shelter' example. PT]