Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: phil@east.berkeley.edu (Phil Lapsley)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: CCIS vs. Inband Signalling Question
Message-ID: <2897@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 15 Jan 90 17:52:01 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 8
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 29, message 4 of 11


Does anybody know what percentage of interoffice trunks now send
signalling information out of band via CCIS?  Before the breakup, Bell
Labs made some comment like it would be 100% CCIS by 1988, but I still
hear those MF tones in the background occasionally.


Phil Lapsley	phil@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU	...!ucbvax!phil