Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!njin!princeton!phoenix!gauss!markv
From: markv@gauss.Princeton.EDU (Mark VandeWettering)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Create Comp.graphics.subgroups please???
Message-ID: <12964@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 16 Jan 90 15:19:35 GMT
References: <8606@pixar.UUCP>
Sender: news@phoenix.Princeton.EDU
Reply-To: markv@gauss.Princeton.EDU (Mark VandeWettering)
Organization: Princeton University
Lines: 24

In article <8606@pixar.UUCP> thaw@pixar.UUCP (Tom Williams) writes:
>>I do not know the exact procedure for this but could we
>>divide up the comp.graphics newsgroups into perhaps...

I would like to see comp.graphics split as well.  It seems that there
are many different kinds of graphics users, and creating different
newsgroups would help everyone get the kind of appropriate response
they need.

comp.graphics.formats is an excellent idea, to file the plethora of postings
about transferring images between different formats.

I don't know if comp.graphics.2d and comp.graphics.3d are as good of an 
idea, the breaking out of the two seems slightly wierd.

How 'bout the formation of a sources group?  comp.sources.graphics?  Any
body believe that would be useful.

I would also like to see a comp.graphics.research group as well, that
emphasized more esoteric and research applications.

Let the open debate begin!

Mark VandeWettering