Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ns-mx!ceres!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!agate!shelby!lindy!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!sneezy
From: sneezy@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Frank Farm)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os9
Subject: Re: a poll
Keywords: poll
Message-ID: <7223@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 16 Jan 90 09:26:05 GMT
References: <25ac4f3b:45comp.os.os9@vpnet.UUCP> <12663@cbnewsd.ATT.COM>
Sender: news@lindy.Stanford.EDU (News Service)
Reply-To: sneezy@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Frank Farm)
Organization: UCSC Undergrads
Lines: 22

In article <12663@cbnewsd.ATT.COM> knudsen@cbnewsd.ATT.COM (michael.j.knudsen) writes:

>[Brian Dunn's message deleted]
>Well, here's mine.  I've been happy with 6809 Level 2 on a Coco 3
>for some time, and have held off getting an ST or AMiga mostly
>since the OS9/68K for them has no grafix.  Waiting to see how the
>KMA-68/CocoPro-4 project turns out, too.

And here's mine:  My sentiments are nearly identical to Michael's.
However, I don't have a hard drive (yet) and so am probably not quite
as happy as he is.  I investigated a bit into Ataris and Amigas, but
when I discovered that OS-9 would not run as the base operating system
on them, I knew I would never buy one of them.  And words cannot describe
my anticipation in seeing the results of the KMA-68.

>BTW, I don't really care about a grafix Shell (a la Mac or MultiView)
>per se, but I want easy-to-use support to write grafix applications
>programs for users who'll control it all from the mouse.

Request seconded!

Frank Farm