Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!CHEETAH.NYSER.NET!mrose
From: mrose@CHEETAH.NYSER.NET (Marshall Rose)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.dev-environ
Subject: Re: En coding RFC 1006 addresses in X.500
Message-ID: <21735.632160859@cheetah.nyser.net>
Date: 12 Jan 90 16:14:19 GMT
References: <38120005@hpindda.HP.COM>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 18

>    What is the current status of the use of "An Interim approach to use of
>    Network Addresses" by S.E. Kille?

The Interim Approach is fully implemented in 6.0 (it was mostly
implemented in 5.0).

>    If I recieve a Presentation Address from Quipu (or any other X.500)
>    which has an NSAP component with a prefix of 540072872203, can I assume
>    that this is an encoding of a RFC 1006 address?

Yes.

>    Is there another method for encoding RFC 1006 addresses into NSAPs, or
>    for  storing them in naming services such as X.500?

No.

/mtr