Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL From: SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: America on Line Message-ID: <9001171406.AA10465@apple.com> Date: 17 Jan 90 13:54:12 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: School of Business - U. of Connecticut Lines: 29 On Sun, 14 Jan 90 14:44:12 PST Lynda Botez said: >Subj: Apple // Wish List 90-01-09 23:00:42 EST >From: AFL JCline Msgs: 27 (90-01-11) > >in the market. A very agressive marketing group is developing a marketing plan >and they want grass roots input. I was there as representative of user groups NOT very aggressive until there is an Internet address (AppleLink or Apple.Com) where they will receive (and perhaps even occasionally reply to) email from the user community at large (presumably they'd have a mailbox on America-Online too). >The ground rules are simple if you want to be herd: ^^^^ Freudian slip?? :-O >This Apple marketing team will be reading all of your input and again, if you >want to be heard - be up - be positive. But do it now, this team is >aggressive, >they are moving and shooting so give them your ammunition while the action is >dynamic. Can anyone offer an AppleLink (Corporate Edition) address, i.e. name@AppleLink.Apple.Com for this *ahem* aggressive marketing team? I find it interesting that a group characterized as aggressive speaks through a third party; when they find their own voice, they'll be somewhat more credible. /s Murph [Internet] or ...{psuvax1 or mcvax}!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall [UUCP] + Standard disclaimer applies ("The opinions expressed are my own" etc.)