Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL From: SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Results of comp.sys.apple2.tech vote Message-ID: <9001171452.AA12562@apple.com> Date: 17 Jan 90 14:43:29 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: School of Business - U. of Connecticut Lines: 21 On Mon, 15 Jan 90 17:28:54 GMT Cary Farrier said: >The results of the voting on the comp.sys.apple2.tech newsgroup are in: > > YES: 90 > NO: 30 Gee, only 120 votes total? Considering the verbosity of this group, either we are (a little more than) 120 REAL chatterboxes, or (more likely I think) there's a powerful lot of apathy out there. I wonder how many folks failed to vote properly (sent a comment to comp.sys.apple instead of email to Farrier@Apple.COM)? I'd guess that changing the name from comp.sys.apple to comp.sys.apple2 would be a LOT less controversial (anyone planning to vote 'no'??), but taking a vote will not be worth the trouble (might even lead the powers that be to question the cost-benefit of comp.sys.apple) if we can only muster 120 voters :-( /s Murph [Internet] or ...{psuvax1 or mcvax}!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall [UUCP] + Standard disclaimer applies ("The opinions expressed are my own" etc.)