Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!bmartin From: bmartin@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Brian Martin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Perceptions of speed (was Re: MIP rating for the Mac II) Keywords: performance Message-ID: <6195@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> Date: 17 Jan 90 18:38:01 GMT References: <2788@mtuno.ATT.COM> <15663@haddock.ima.isc.com> Reply-To: bmartin@uhccux.UUCP (Brian Martin) Organization: University of Hawaii Lines: 37 a digression... I recall reading somewhere (probably some IBM sales literature for one of their "mainframes") that the user's perception of a machine's speed is directly dependent on the time it takes a message to appear on screen after the user presses a key. They made the point that on a heavily loaded processor, printing a "processing your request" message within 1/2 second of the user pressing a key would fool the user into thinking that the machine was not loaded down. That's one of the reasons they put I/O processors on their "multi-channel" machines. Here's the point: my Apollo, which is an old 12MHz 68020, feels a whole lot faster than the Mac IIci running Multifinder, even though the Apollo runs various benchmarks much slower than the mac. With a backup across the network to a tape drive running in one window, a compile running in background in a another window, and an editor in the foreground, the machine still gives me the perception of responsiveness. With a couple of programs loaded under Multifinder on the mac (word, spelling coach, wingz, and statview) the mac feels real sluggish, and tends to crash at very inopportune moments. -- Brian ==== Brian K. Martin, M.D. Assistant Research Professor (hat #1) University of Hawaii/ Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, and CEO (hat #2) Martin Information Systems, Ltd. 1103 9th Avenue, Suite 203 Honolulu, Hawai`i 96816-2403 Voice (808) 733-2003 Fax (808) 733-2011 ARPA: uhccux!bmartin@nosc.MIL UUCP: {uunet,dcdwest,ucbvax}!ucsd!nosc!uhccux!bmartin INTERNET: bmartin@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu