Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!sauron!wescott
From: wescott@Columbia.NCR.COM (Mike Wescott)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr
Subject: Re: Dimension table overflow
Message-ID: <1895@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM>
Date: 15 Jan 90 16:36:42 GMT
References: <324@cmsfl>
Sender: news@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM
Reply-To: wescott@micky.Columbia.NCR.COM (Mike Wescott)
Organization: E&M-Columbia, NCR Corp, W Columbia, SC
Lines: 19

In article <324@cmsfl> nigel@cmsfl@labtam.oz (Nigel Harwood) writes:
> Anyway I increased the -Sd,2000 in the CFLAGS to -Sd,3000 and tried
> again.  It worked okay.

> Any comments on this ?  i.e. is it an indication that we are putting
> too much into the kernel or is it just a matter of 2000 being the
> normal default for most users.

No. Just an indication that the compiler was not set up to handle
such a large program as the default.

> Also I would not expect the 2000 to 3000 change to have made any
> difference to the resultant kernel i.e. size wise, would it ?

No effect on kernel size, just the compiler.

--
	-Mike Wescott
	 mike.wescott@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM