Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!unido!mpirbn!p576spz From: p576spz@mpirbn.UUCP (S.Petra Zeidler) Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix Subject: Re: Managing a network of UNIX workstations Summary: our experience Message-ID: <514@mpirbn.UUCP> Date: 15 Jan 90 13:38:03 GMT References: <3949@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> <9338@cbmvax.commodore.com> <12938@watcgl.waterloo.edu> Reply-To: spz@mpirbn.UUCP (S.Petra Zeidler) Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn Lines: 32 We've got 3 "systemless" DS3100 being servered by a VS3100. We are using Yellow Pages, home is /home/$VAXname/$USERname, swap and /tmp are on local disc (/tmp to speed up compiling); I called the Riscs systemless because they have data-discs connected to them (640 Mb = one data-set) which get moved according to need. (Would that answer your removable data-carrier problem ? :^} ) System security and look-alike-ness : only root is allowed to log in on the VS3100; changes to the DS3100's systems are done on the server. Backup: data are to be saved by the users,because only they know when it's sensible; home and the like is all on the server. Our net is running fine enough for 3 machines, but our next DS3100 will be standalones because the net would go down too much if 6 users compiled simultaneously (3 users already sync themselves fine,thank you 8^} ); also we might want to run a machine single-user with a really huge job. I hope this helps you on spz uunet!unido!mpirbn!spz or spz@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de I represent the opinion of a small blue extraterrestrial I happen to know; noone elses, not even my own. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> <> <> <> THIS IS THE END ... <> <> of this message <> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>